Is your AI-built app safe? Security by platform.
Every AI builder ships its own default security gaps — open databases, exposed keys, missing auth. Pick your platform to see the common risks and how to secure your app before you launch.
Is Lovable safe?
→Lovable ships fast and wires up a Supabase backend for you — but it routinely leaves your database read-open.
Is Supabase safe?
→Supabase is secure by design — but only if you turn on and correctly configure row-level security. Most exposure comes from skipping that step.
Is Replit safe?
→Replit Agent builds and deploys full apps — including their secrets and databases. The risk is what gets left public on deploy.
Is Bolt safe?
→Bolt (bolt.new) generates full-stack apps in the browser. Speed is the point — security review is on you.
Is v0 safe?
→v0 by Vercel is great at UI and increasingly full-stack — which means it can also wire up exposed data access.
Is Firebase safe?
→Firebase is powerful — and the #1 cause of Firebase breaches is security rules left in test/open mode.
Is Base44 safe?
→Base44 builds full apps with auth and data baked in — which makes its authorization layer the thing to verify.
Is Cursor safe?
→Cursor is an AI code editor — the risk isn't Cursor itself, it's the insecure code its agent confidently writes.
Is Claude Code safe?
→Claude Code is a capable terminal coding agent — the security question is what its generated code and tool use leave exposed.
Is GitHub Copilot safe?
→GitHub Copilot accelerates coding — and can just as easily autocomplete an insecure pattern into your codebase.
Is Windsurf safe?
→Windsurf is an agentic AI IDE — fast at building, but its generated code and agent permissions still need a security pass.
Not sure which risks apply to you?
Paste your deployed URL for a free launch-readiness scan. You get an instant security-headers grade on-screen, then a human-reviewed, insured clearance before you launch.